Pilot study
findings
The finding
of the pilot study (see table 1) produced the following results.
The mean of all 10 questions in the seven-point Likert scale survey, fell
very close to four. As a four equates to an unsure response, this
suggests that the public affairs practitioners surveyed may not be clear
on how military leadership views their role and utility within the command
structure.
Another
interesting aspect of the survey was the wide variance of answers to some
of the questions. In certain cases there was as much as a seven point
range in the responses. This suggested there may be a difference
in how certain services view the perception of their leaders. It
could be postulated that certain services have a better understanding of
how to utilize their public affairs assets. If this true, further
research may be necessary in order to determine what those branches of
the services are doing correctly, and incorporate the information into
a possible long-term solution.
This
led the researchers to conclude that any further data gathering should
be separated by the individual services in order to avoid the possibility
of conflicting viewpoints.
Pilot study weaknesses
The pilot
study is a convenience sample of public affairs practitioners in the Department
of Defense Joint Communications Course. Although it is representative
of all of the services, it is not generalizeable across the public affairs
community because the course is not representative of the public affairs
population. Because the course features some of the premier public
affairs practitioners in the field, many of the respondents may have a
more favorable view of their career and the PA career field.
In addition,
a small sample was used which also makes it less representative of the
population. The pilot study did not ask for subjects to disclose
their service, this is also a weakness because there may be obvious discrepancies
between the way the services treat public affairs. This research
created the framework for the design of the second stage. |
Homepage
Introduction
Literature Review
Stage 1
Stage 2
Participants
Experiment
Materials/Design
Analysis
Limitations
Projected Results
Discussion
References |